By Bettina Arndt

Augusto Zimmermann, WA Law Reform Commissioner is calling for us to challenge the “dangerous family law changes” and to encourage people to complete the questionaire.
Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2017 7:23:12 PM
Subject: Stand up against dangerous Family Law changes – recruit people for questionnaire

Below is an important message from my friend Bettina Arndt. Both Bettina and I are speaking at the International Conference on Men’s Issues Conference on the Gold Coast June 9-11, along with Mark Latham, Professor Ken Arenson and many amazing international speakers. Kind regards, Augusto

…and from Bettina Arndt

From: Bettina Arndt
Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2017 3:41 PM
Subject: recruit people for questionnaire

 Hi Everyone,

 I am about to post this in my section on men’s issues on the new Mark Latham website. https://marklathamsoutsiders.com/category/contributors/bettina-arndt/

 He’s had well over a million viewings of the website and facebook page in the few weeks it has been running. The facebook page gets a lot more comments. https://www.facebook.com/MarkLathamsOutsiders/

It would be great if you encouraged people to join in the discussion.

In particular you will see I am trying to make sure we get as many people as possible to fill in the anonymous questionnaire being used by the parliamentary committee looking into the Family Court and domestic violence. I am very concerned this is a total snow job which will be used to argue how all the allegations of violence and abuse that surface in the Court are actually real. So please try to circulate this as widely as possible and get people to fill that in and lobby members of the committee.

 Thanks, Tina

 See the article below and attached, in case that is easier for you.

Stand up against dangerous Family Law changes

 

Ok, good men and women. Here’s our chance to resist the forces of evil determined to make life even more difficult for men in Australia. We can’t afford to do nothing while anti-male lobby groups take control of a vital parliamentary committee looking into the Family Court and domestic violence.

It’s all happening because Hetty Johnston has managed to lean on Malcolm Turnbull and his colleagues and convinced them that most of the allegations of violence and sexual abuse that fly around in the Family Court are actually true. In fact most family lawyers will tell you it is a known tactic to make such allegations to gain advantage in family court battles. Four years ago retiring Family Court Judge David Collier spoke out about false abuse allegations becoming a major court weapon – current judges say the situation has become much worse.

The trouble is Hetty Johnston, who has been a ferocious campaigner for children through her Bravehearts organisation, is determined to make the Family Court take all these accusations at face value. Apparently her hope is to persuade the parliamentary committee that the burden of proof should be shifted so that it isn’t assumed that someone is innocent until proven guilty but rather that the person accused of abuse must prove that it didn’t happen. And that is pretty much impossible.

This shift isn’t actually included in the terms of reference for the inquiry but what is there is bad enough. Like the idea that domestic violence accusations should have an impact on property division.

Just in case you think there’s no way this is all going to happen take a look at the changes that are creeping in across the country under the AVO laws. The classic case is Western Australia where the government has ignored the advice of the Law Reform Commission and changed the law to allow AVOs to be issued when a woman simply claims she fears violence, with no evidence required whatsoever. And we are not just talking about physical violence but emotional and even “banking” and financial abuse.  Here’s an article from Augusto Zimmermann, a brave WA Law Reform Commissioner who has been fighting fiercely against such changes, arguing that innocent men are losing their homes and their children as a result of these dangerous laws.

Then there’s the rape laws in Victoria. That state is one of the most anti-male jurisdictions in the world according to law professor Ken Arenson who spelt out how this came to be in an article published in the Western Australian JuristThe Demise of Equality Before the Law.  Arenson showed the extraordinary influence of feminist law professors in framing the new legislation now making it so hard for innocent men to defend themselves against such charges.

Both Professor Zimmermann and Arenson are speaking at the International Conference on Men’s Issues Conference on the Gold Coast June 9-11, along with Mark Latham and I, plus many amazing international speakers.

But in the meantime we all need to get active and make sure this parliamentary committee doesn’t fall for the lobbying trying to persuade them to recommend damaging changes to Family Law.

The committee has an anonymous questionnaire which is being used to canvass the experiences of people about the way violence and sexual abuse are dealt with in the Family Court system. It’s a total snow job, carefully set up to promote the idea that all such accusations have validity. The women’s groups are lobbying their members to fill in the questionnaire which will then provide a really slanted view of this whole issue. We urgently need lots of people who have had experiences with false accusations to fill in this questionnaire, explaining that it misrepresents the real situation. Please circulate it widely.

Plus you can lobby members of the parliamentary committee. There are some with open minds like Tim Wilson, Susan Leys and George Christensen but Sharon Clayton and Emma Husar are likely to be pushing for some of the dangerous ideas. Sadly the chair Sarah Henderson has pretty much shown where she’s coming from in this interview with Sky News.

The Family Court has a long history of being biased against men. I was involved in various government committees during the John Howard era which introduced some positive changes but there’s a long way to go.

But we can’t afford to have this parliamentary committee snowed by a flood of anti-male propaganda disguised as protection for women and children. It’s scary how much our basic human rights have been undermined already due to the efforts of these powerful lobby groups. Help me take them on.

 

  • admin says:

    Long standing critic of the Family Law system and the domestic violence legislation, Colin J. has distributed the following to encourage people to respond to the current Federal Inquiry into Family Law and Domestic Violence. He has just completed the anonymous questionnaire, which he says is ” just a feminist fraud intended to exclude any comments regarding the injustices of the DV laws and the Family Court”.

    He continues: Nobody should imagine that there is a single Federal or State politician of any party or none who is not fully aware of these injustices. Malcolm Turnbull and the rest know exactly the real motives behind the moves to increase and magnify the injustices by ever “tougher” anti-male, anti-family laws purportedly intended to lessen DV — with that term being defined to encompass any vexation by a male against a woman, and to incur draconian penalties immediately on accusation — and when they pretend otherwise they are guilty of lying humbug. Almost all politicians automatically back every hideous feminist Family Law and DV draft law from fear that otherwise they will be labelled “soft” on Domestic Violence by the feminists, defamed and pilloried.

    The vast-scale injustices being suffered by men and children all over the country every day in consequence of the DV laws , the Family Court, and the associated feminist bureaucracies will only be ended when there is a sufficiently widespread, well-led, ruthless, and carefully targeted eradication campaign by forces for justice to make the LibLabs more frightened of those forces than they are of the feminists. In the interim every one of the cases of such injustices which are brought to the attention of almost any LibLab politician will continue to be heard with pretended grave concern, but with secret contempt and an adamant secret determination to persist in total subservience to the feminists.

    I’d say that there’s a good chance that Mark Latham and his new party will have the will and skill to launch such a campaign: if they do they will automatically, in consequence, gain the votes of at least 10-20% of the electorate.

    Colin J.

Leave a Reply